Skip to content
Raptive
7,037 publishers listed · +61 this month
1.9B/mo
monthly visits, measured
est. $35.4M/mo ad revenue
85.6% confirmed live
vs
Ezoic
10,864 publishers listed · +421 this month
748.3M/mo
monthly visits, measured
est. $8.8M/mo ad revenue
80.8% confirmed live

Raptive confirms more of what it claims. 85.6% of its publishers had the ad config read live on the page, against Ezoic's 80.8%.

Raptive runs the deeper setup. Its platform was found on 5,570 sites, averaging 10.3 placements and 9.0 demand partners per site, against Ezoic's 2.1 and none.

01

Scale

1.9BMonthly traffic748.3M
$35.4MEst. ad revenue per month$8.8M
7,037Publishers running it10,864
6,023Confirmed live8,781
5,570Sites running its platform8,455
+61Joined this month+421
02

Proof

85.6%Confirmation rate80.8%
717Not seen live2,975
03

Setup depth

10.3Avg ad placements per site2.1
9.0Avg demand partners per site
04

Overlap

6,939Runs this network only8,040
1Runs both1
Every publisher counted here evidences the network in its own files, either by loading its config or by naming it in ads.txt. Listings that appear only in a network's sellers.json are left out, since those are inventory it can resell rather than sites it runs. Revenue is modelled from placements, traffic and geography, so it sizes each network's book of inventory and says nothing about what either network pays.

More comparisons: Mediavine vs NitroPay · Raptive vs Ezoic · or open Raptive and Ezoic in full