Skip to content
Mediavine
8,568 publishers listed · +251 this month
751.3M/mo
monthly visits, measured
est. $13.7M/mo ad revenue
86.7% confirmed live
vs
Raptive
7,037 publishers listed · +61 this month
1.9B/mo
monthly visits, measured
est. $35.4M/mo ad revenue
85.6% confirmed live

Mediavine confirms more of what it claims. 86.7% of its publishers had the ad config read live on the page, against Raptive's 85.6%.

Mediavine runs the deeper setup. Its platform was found on 7,143 sites, averaging 25.0 placements and 37.9 demand partners per site, against Raptive's 10.3 and 9.0.

01

Scale

751.3MMonthly traffic1.9B
$13.7MEst. ad revenue per month$35.4M
8,568Publishers running it7,037
7,432Confirmed live6,023
7,143Sites running its platform5,570
+251Joined this month+61
02

Proof

86.7%Confirmation rate85.6%
1,014Not seen live717
03

Setup depth

25.0Avg ad placements per site10.3
37.9Avg demand partners per site9.0
04

Overlap

8,372Runs this network only6,932
8Runs both8
Every publisher counted here evidences the network in its own files, either by loading its config or by naming it in ads.txt. Listings that appear only in a network's sellers.json are left out, since those are inventory it can resell rather than sites it runs. Revenue is modelled from placements, traffic and geography, so it sizes each network's book of inventory and says nothing about what either network pays.

More comparisons: Mediavine vs NitroPay · Raptive vs Ezoic · or open Mediavine and Raptive in full