8,568 publishers listed · +251 this month
751.3M/mo
monthly visits, measured
est. $13.7M/mo ad revenue
86.7% confirmed live
vs
NitroPay
467 publishers listed · +69 this month
519.5M/mo
monthly visits, measured
est. $5M/mo ad revenue
61.2% confirmed live
Mediavine confirms more of what it claims. 86.7% of its publishers had the ad config read live on the page, against NitroPay's 61.2%.
Mediavine runs the deeper setup. Its platform was found on 7,143 sites, averaging 25.0 placements and 37.9 demand partners per site, against NitroPay's 2.0 and none.
01
Scale
751.3MMonthly traffic519.5M
$13.7MEst. ad revenue per month$5M
8,568Publishers running it467
7,432Confirmed live286
7,143Sites running its platform267
+251Joined this month+69
02
Proof
86.7%Confirmation rate61.2%
1,014Not seen live452
03
Setup depth
25.0Avg ad placements per site2.0
37.9Avg demand partners per site
04
Overlap
8,378Runs this network only438
2Runs both2
Every publisher counted here evidences the network in its own files, either by loading its config or by naming it in ads.txt. Listings that appear only in a network's sellers.json are left out, since those are inventory it can resell rather than sites it runs. Revenue is modelled from placements, traffic and geography, so it sizes each network's book of inventory and says nothing about what either network pays.
More comparisons: Mediavine vs NitroPay · Raptive vs Ezoic · or open Mediavine and NitroPay in full